Article
7 min
ArticleEmployee engagement
5 min read ·August 24, 2024
Written by
Former People Scientist, Culture Amp
Today, workplaces have moved toward being team-oriented environments. Workloads are interdependent and dispersed across employees, and we’ve seen great benefits to this shift.
Team structure helps companies achieve complex goals beyond one employee's capability alone. However, we must also consider the challenges that come along with this diffusion of responsibility. One main issue we've seen is employees being accountable for their work.
Workplace accountability is about following through and recognizing that other team members depend on your work's results. Each team member should take responsibility for their commitments, actions, and the consequences of their actions.
Workplace accountability is crucial for cultivating a culture of high performance. Internal research has demonstrated that high-performing employees are particularly attuned to the contributions of others. When team members aren’t contributing, this can impact a teammate’s desire to stay. For example, senior consultants with a global professional services firm were 1.7x more likely to leave when they perceived others weren’t being held accountable for delivering at work.
When it comes to people and culture, who is truly responsible for driving things like engagement and organizational culture?
We’ve heard various perspectives that generally sit in two camps of thought. Some believe that people and culture initiatives are the responsibility of leadership or HR. Others believe “the people make the place". They feel that responsibility lies among individual employees tasked with shaping the organization's culture.
We believe there isn't one right way to determine who is responsible. There are pros and cons to each of these approaches.
Some researchers and practitioners believe that individuals are responsible for their own engagement. To a degree, being engaged is a choice.
Organizations can offer all the learning and development, coaching, support, and perks one could imagine, but if an employee does not want to utilize and benefit from them, they are unlikely to reap the benefits (i.e., feeling engaged at work). Further, employees can respond to the daily stressors they face at work in a productive or maladaptive way.
But of course, there are pros and cons to this perspective.
Others believe that engagement is a top-down process – that only managers and the organization can truly take action and drive change.
As we identified above, there are things that the organization is responsible for and that employees have little to no influence over. But, again, there are some considerations to keep in mind.
So what does Culture Amp recommend regarding accountability for employee engagement? Take an approach that empowers individuals at all levels of the organization to be accountable.
This will encourage managers to empower employees to take action on the things they have control over (e.g., continuous learning) while simultaneously holding managers and the organization responsible for system-level impacts on individual-level experiences (e.g., poor resourcing).
Once you have outlined the roles and responsibilities of each organizational layer, you can embed your larger philosophy into all aspects of our organization. Initially, you’ll want to define what accountability looks like in your organization. Then you can ask questions on your engagement survey to measure this throughout the employee lifecycle.
Finally, you can empower all levels of your organization to take action based on your survey results. The reality is that individuals, departments, managers, and the organization are responsible for creating an engaging experience in the workplace.